The argument against it goes as follows. The “historical fiction” label serves only to indicate a book’s setting. This is because novels in recognized genres incorporate plot patterns that let readers know what they’ll be getting. In romances, you have a central romantic relationship and an optimistic, “happily ever after” (or “happy for now”) ending. With mysteries, you get a crime, investigation, or other type of puzzle that’s resolved by the end, often by a detective figuring out where the clues lead. Psychological suspense novels offer creepy atmosphere, a heightened sense of disturbance, and complex plots with startling twists. With historical fiction, though, there are no story conventions to adhere to. Plus the plots and writing styles are too diverse to fit under a single category. Therefore, it’s not a genre at all, just a collective term to refer to novels set in the past.
I can understand the reasoning. But as a librarian who’s written two lengthy tomes whose titles make my opinion on the matter kind of obvious, I have some thoughts I wanted to put out there for consideration.
Pub. by Bloomsbury/Libraries Unlimited (2005 and 2009)
This post is based on concepts mentioned in the books and expands upon subsequent comments I've made in Facebook discussions. The books are, admittedly, expensive at list price, but your library may have one or both, or can get you copies via interlibrary loan.
In short: it’s true that historical fiction isn’t a genre in the same way that romance, mystery, and psychological suspense novels are genres.
But it is still a genre, one with its own writing conventions and reader expectations, though these aren’t based around plot.
There’s an area within librarianship called readers’ advisory (RA for short), which concerns itself with connecting readers with books. The term is most often used with respect to leisure reading, which covers both fiction and nonfiction. Readers’ advisory librarians—I count myself among them—use our knowledge of books’ genres and subgenres, as well as other factors, to help readers find their perfect literary match.
Among writers, genres can have a negative connotation if they’re thought of as restrictive barriers. But within RA, the idea behind genres isn’t to pigeonhole books into rigid categories but to group them according to elements that appeal to readers and make it easier for them to find more books they enjoy. Novels can fit into multiple genres, too. “Genre-blends” are most definitely a thing, a very popular one. Ever heard of romantasy?
For anyone interested in this topic, I’d suggest checking out The Readers’ Advisory Guide to Genre Fiction by librarians Neal Wyatt and Joyce G. Saricks, now out in its 3rd edition (ALA Editions, 2019). It’s a classic text in the field, with chapters organized around the different fiction genres. Joyce was one of my editors when I wrote for NoveList (a RA database for libraries) years ago, and I’ve worked with Neal in the past in various capacities related to RA work; they know their stuff.
Within this book, fantasy, westerns, and historical fiction are termed “landscape genres.” Genres don’t have to be based around common plot patterns, although some of them are. The landscape genres are defined based on a different type of content: their settings, the type of worldbuilding and background detail the author uses, and the resulting experience for their readers (like, for historical fiction, immersion into an earlier time).
Intricately described settings, real or imaginary, create realms and set readers within them. This is the hallmark of the Landscape genres. Worldbuilding reigns here in novels rich with evocative landscapes, sumptuously realized settings, and fascinating framing detail … These novels turn readers into literary tourists, whisking them away to different locales and time periods, providing context and detail to new worlds and histories. (Wyatt and Saricks, p.121)
It’s interesting to note that I haven’t seen the same “not a genre!” arguments around fantasy and westerns that exist around historical fiction, even though these novels are similarly varied in terms of plot structure, writing styles, characters, and pacing. Science fiction is another; it has its tropes, as historical fiction does, but no single overarching story arc.
All genres have parameters, and those for historical fiction are often debated. For example, how far back should a novel be set for it to qualify? But historical novels— regardless of the subgenre they fall into—do share many commonalities, like their authors’ attempts to reimagine a past time and place, including the physical setting, character mindsets, customs, beliefs, and more, in a way that integrates these details smoothly into an engaging story.
Exceptions test the boundaries of the genre definition and prove that these boundaries exist. Romance readers will cry “not a romance” if a love story were to end tragically. Fans of horror fiction won’t be satisfied if a book labeled as such lacked a dark, dread-inducing atmosphere. And historical novels with insufficient historical ambience, too many anachronisms, or inconsistent worldbuilding, or those set too close to the present day, will elicit “this isn’t really historical fiction” type comments.
It’s within the subgenres that we can see marked diversity in terms of plot structures and writing styles. Historical mystery, historical romance, sagas, historical adventure, etc., all have loyal fans, some of whom prefer to remain within that smaller focus. Other readers are genre omnivores (like me) and prefer to branch out across most or all of them.
![]() |
| The subgenre (and setting and era) diversity of historical fiction on display! |
The Historical Fiction Book Lovers Facebook group, which has over 700,000 members, has semi-regular posts debating the genre definition but seems, nonetheless, to understand the scope of its large umbrella. Recent posts have recommended Sena Jeter Naslund’s Ahab’s Wife (literary historical), Ilima Todd’s A Song for the Stars (inspirational/romance/biographical historical), Alix E. Harrow’s The Ten Thousand Doors of January (historical fantasy), Irina Shapiro’s The Lovers (timeslip/historical romance), Rosamunde Pilcher’s September (saga), Tananarive Due’s The Reformatory (historical horror), Ken Follett’s Hornet Flight (historical thriller) and Sheila Williams’ No Better Time (a traditional historical novel).
One genre, many facets, and a large and wonderfully diverse assortment of stories. All with historical settings designed for readers to dive right into.









