tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19307003.post4180788127400593683..comments2024-03-27T22:25:42.129-05:00Comments on Reading the Past: Why Nadya—but not Wallis? A guest post by Kat Meads, author of For You, Madam LeninSarah Johnsonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13340312953393474963noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19307003.post-20860613288261500622013-05-13T18:08:50.554-05:002013-05-13T18:08:50.554-05:00You made the right call for sure. Wallis Simpson w...You made the right call for sure. Wallis Simpson was a most boring and superficial sort, a parasite on the body social. <br /><br />So it's also interesting to contrast these women and their destinies as well!<br /><br />Foxessahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06754083123669916994noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19307003.post-89898177447778185972013-05-13T13:23:12.714-05:002013-05-13T13:23:12.714-05:00Given all of the "biofiction" currently ...Given all of the "biofiction" currently being written, I have been curious as to how, and why, writers form their characters out of what is known about "real life" people. Obviously, some are more successful than others. It has to "work", as Nadya did for Kat.<br /><br />Sarah OLAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com